Should Your Company Switch CRM Systems?

CRM systems can be complex or simple, but the level of complexity must match the business’s needs and deliver a return on the CRM investment. In 2026, businesses are assessing the cost of their CRM systems and ensuring it matches the functionality needed to enhance all customer interactions. This guide will help with that assesment. 

Guide Contributors

photo of mickey patton ceo clear c2

Mickey Patton

President & CEO

Charlie Spaneas

Charlie Spaneas

Director of Sales

Photo James Jurczewsky

James Jurczewsky

Vice President R&D

Clear C2, Inc.
Clear C2, Inc. is a software development firm located in Coppell, Texas. Our employees are dedicated to delivering enterprise business solutions for our customers. The award-winning C2CRM solution embodies the expertise and experience gathered over the past 30 years, delivering those solutions.

CRM Industry Solutions Expertise

Our focus for the past 30 years in the CRM industry has been to deliver customized CRM functionality and customer service at a price point that is acceptable to Fortune 500 companies as well as small-to-medium businesses.   The lessons learned during the evolution of our solution into an enterprise application have solidified our in-depth knowledge of what businesses need from their software vendors.  The application of this knowledge into an ideal solution for each of our customers is our goal, providing a unique and cost beneficial platform to manage their customers.

This example portfolio has customers from very large to small and from different industries.

Introduction
As we entered 2026 there were over 2013 CRM products listed on the Capterra software listing platform and over 930 verified listings on the G2 platform.   Most buyers are overwhelmed by the options and despite this saturation, 40-50% of the market is concentrated in the top 5 vendors.  Salesforce, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, and HubSpot are regarded by most as the top 5 in revenue, with some listings having Adobe and Zoho as well.  Salesforce is reported in some listings as having a substantial 26% of the market with revenues for 2025 of $37.9 billion. 
 
Those numbers are great for Salesforce, its executive team, and its shareholders.  However, is it good for CRM customers and the CRM industry to have such a dominant company dictate CRM pricing, customer service, and implementation costs?  Is the functionality needed from CRM systems in line with the increase in year-to-year cost of the Big 5?  
bar chart showing salesforce growing pricing

Salesforce continues to increase pricing for the Enterprise Version and continues to “add on” pricing for storage, user tiers, and AI agentic use by the customer.

 

The Cost

A Big 5 CRM system cost breakdown has implementation fees by a 3rd party, a licensing fee by the vendor, and often the need for a full-time administrator.

 

1.The Implementation Fee (One-Time)

  • Standard Setup: For a 50-user install with basic lead, opportunity, and account mapping, consultants usually charge between $50,000 and $75,000.
  • Complex Setup: If the company requires integration with an ERP (such as SAP or Oracle), custom CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) logic, or migration of 10+ years of legacy data, the cost often ranges from $100,000 to $150,000.
  • The industry “Rule of Thumb”: Most Salesforce implementation partners quote a 1:1 or 1.5:1 ratio. This means for every $1 spent on licenses, the company will spend $1 to $1.50 on the initial implementation

 

2.The License “Buy-In” (Year 1)

  • For 50 users on the Enterprise Edition ($175/user/month):
    • Annual License Total: $105,000.
    • Premier Support: Salesforce often adds a 30% fee for human support, bringing the total to $31,500.
    • Total Year 1 Outlay: ~$136,500 (Software) + ~$75,000 (Implementation) = $211,500.

 

3.The “Hidden” Maintenance Cost

  • A 50-user Salesforce installation is complex enough to almost always require a Certified Salesforce Administrator.
    • Average Salary: $90,000 – $120,000 per year.
    • Managed Service Alternative: Hiring an agency to manage it typically costs $3,000–$6,000 per month.
bar chart showing total annual cost for 50 crm users

The Service Gap

There are many factors in the cost of any software system. Most SaaS solutions start their offerings with tiered pricing. However, soon after the initial licensing cost, feature creep pricing, storage premiums, usage tiers, and a separate support cost follow. Why does a customer of a service need to pay extra to have someone help them use that service? Shouldn’t the cost of the service be included in the high licensing fees? When you subscribe to a streaming service for a monthly fee, do you also have to pay to watch a movie or show?

 

Salesforce and Oracle charge for support based on licensing or a Percentage-of-Spend model. Microsoft and HubSpot offer fixed tiers. SAP has a tiered model, but the Premium Engagement model is widely regarded as very expensive.

The “Percentage of Spend” Model (Salesforce & Oracle)
Using this model, the vendor automatically increases their support revenue when they increase licensing pricing.

  • Salesforce: Typically, 30% of net license fees for Premier Success.
  • Oracle: Historically uses a 22% of net license fee for annual maintenance and support.

 

The “Tiered Fixed Fee” Model (Microsoft Dynamics & HubSpot)

  • This model is based on the service level you choose. The cost does not increase with a licensing price increase; however, the flat fee charge is typically a high cost for the benefit.
    Microsoft Dynamics 365: Offers Professional, Unified, and Enhanced support. These are often flat monthly fees (e.g., $5k–$15k+/month) or based on a “pool” of hours.
  • HubSpot: Theoretically “includes” support in their Professional and Enterprise tiers, but they “gate” the quality. Phone support is only available at higher tiers, and for “Priority” technical help, you are often pushed to hire a Solutions Partner (third-party agency), which functions as an external support cost.

 

The “Standard Maintenance” Model (SAP)

  • SAP: Uses a “Standard” vs. “Enterprise” Support model. Standard support is often bundled at a lower percentage (approx. 19-22%), but for the level of uptime an enterprise requires, most customers are forced into “Premium Engagement” contracts, which are heavily negotiated and often represent the most expensive support contracts in the IT world.

 

Is this expensive support structure, with or without dedicated administrators on the payroll, delivering the system’s promised value?

The Problem

The costly CRM systems from the Big 5 are built for everyone but optimized for no one. Therefore, customers often pay licensing fees for features they do not need or want. The implementation by a 3rd party is expensive, especially for the customized automation needed in a CRM platform that everyone in the organization benefits from using. This “generalist tax” is paid during implementation and also for support and feature licensing.

 

Between 80% and 90% of companies find that “out-of-the-box” (OOTB) CRM functionality does not meet their specific business requirements. As a result, nearly every enterprise-level implementation involves some degree of customization, with approximately 30-40% of these involving complex customization. This complexity, then, in turn, requires the support structure and, therefore, the cost identified above.

 

Often, companies fear that switching from one of the Big 5 platforms is an admission of failure and results in throwing an investment away. However, during a CRM implementation, the most expensive part isn’t the typing of code; it’s the business logic. It’s critical that this business logic mapping is preserved in a switch to a different system. The new system should leverage data mapping, workflow documentation, screen customizations, and ERP integration that work for the business, while addressing processes that are not optimized.

 

Why do customers switch?

chart on why customers switch their crm system

The Bigger Problem

What is the alternative to switching to a different CRM system? One path, as mentioned above, is to reduce features and licensing at renewal to lower costs. The other is to reduce support options or eliminate administrative staff positions.

 

Once those courses of action are taken, the Big 5 CRM system remains extremely expensive, and, as stated above, some level of support is still needed for the complex system, which may not be meeting your business needs.

 

At that point, the problem has become bigger and has a life of its own. It’s now part of the company culture, and leadership doesn’t know where to find the answers.

FAST FACT:

“Did You Know?” Nearly 1 in 10 Salesforce and Oracle customers switch providers every year. The reason isn’t lack of features—it’s Complexity Fatigue. As these giants prioritize their own stock prices with 9% annual price increases, savvy businesses are moving to other solutions to reclaim their focus on selling, not software management.”

The Solution

As mentioned in the Introduction, there are over 2,000 CRM systems on the market. These solutions have varying degrees of features, support, and pricing. It is easy to get overwhelmed and create fear of making a bad decision after an already costly implementation with one of the Big 5.

 

Your switch to a better CRM with a better return has to begin with a process.

  • Start with a definition of success.
  •  Define what is working now in your current solution and what is not working for the entire organization.
  • Document the current processes, workflows, and user experiences that allow users to be productive.
  • Define, in detail, the data sources that populate your current solution
  • Create a roadmap for cleansing your data.
  • Obtain Leadership buy-in for switching and saving budget dollars

 

Now you can look for a solution that fits your organization rather than trying to fit your organization into a one-size-fits-all Big 5 solution.

 

A good place to start is online resource sites. There are many, and most are sponsored by vendors. A few of the most popular sites are in the table below.

A Word from the Authors

This paper was written as a guide to start you on the path to a better experience with your CRM system. The first step is to realize you can switch, not that you have to switch, but you can. If the cost of your solution and its support model are acceptable, you are probably getting value from your current solution.

 

However, if this paper has piqued your interest and you would like some help auditing your CRM system, you can contact us via Contact Us.

 

Clear C2, Inc. has developed C2CRM over the past 30 years as an Enterprise CRM system that can address large enterprise CRM needs as well as small- to medium-sized businesses. The Clear C2 company culture was developed from an understanding that our customers want a customized system at a price point that delivers real return. Clear C2 addresses the very concerns mentioned in this paper.

 

To exemplify that culture, there are distinguishing differences between Clear C2 and the Big 5.

  • Clear C2 does not increase your per-user price – ever.
  • Clear C2 does not charge for support.
  • Clear C2 does not charge a premium for storage or other usage-based fees.
  • Clear C2 does not have an annual contract; the contract is month-to-month.

 

The Big 5 sells you a box of parts and charges you a ‘Service Tax’ to put it together. C2CRM is the only Enterprise CRM that arrives fully assembled. We include implementation, administration, and enterprise support in a single predictable price. We aren’t just your software; we are your CRM department.

CRM System Cost Comparison for a typical 50 user installation.

Image Comparing CRM Pricing

Please contact us with any questions. 972.304.7111 

Would you like to share this?

Clear C2
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.